On
the Money Trail
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Is Gold at $3,000 an Ounce Just a Matter of
Time?
by
Al Jacobs, author of Nobody's Fool: A Skeptic's
Guide to Prosperity
May
2011
Rarely do I fail to read articles on gold, silver or other
precious metals that come to my attention. As it does for many
other persons, the subject fascinates me. To this day I grimly
fanaticize over the Sixteenth Century expeditions of Hernando
Cortez and his looting of Montezuma’s Aztec treasures. Vivid in
my memory is the tale of the Comstock Lode, the 1859 discovery
of silver ore in what is now Virginia City, Nevada, and the
emotions it released. The abortive 1869 manipulation of the gold
market by James Fiske and Jay Gould, resulting in the September
24th panic known as Black Friday, still raises a chuckle
for me. And on the subject of chuckles, there’s nothing to
compare with the fiasco of the Hunt Brothers, Nelson and
William, during their attempted corner of the silver market in
January 1980. Without a doubt, precious metals exert an
insidious affect on the human psyche. They can bring out the
best—and the worst—in all of us.
But,
so much for the psychological impact that gold and its companion
metals impose on society. Let’s get down to this article’s
titled question: Is gold at $3,000 an ounce just a matter of
time? Before addressing this, we must flash back in time to get
an historical perspective of gold’s performance. Without a past
reference, it’s tough to predict the future. An appropriate
date to start our viewing is 1833 - exactly one century before
the world found itself in the depths of perhaps the severest and
most prolonged depression in mankind’s history. And during that
one-hundred-year-period the world price of gold remained nearly
unchanged at between $19 and $25 per ounce. Not until the early
1930’s, when the price of the metal became regulated by
government fiat, did its value began to fluctuate. By 1934 the
value of gold settled in at $35 per ounce, largely the result of
the U. S. government, under newly-elected President Franklin D.
Roosevelt, setting that as an established price together with a
prohibition of gold ownership by its citizens. And there, at
$35 per ounce, the price remained until 1970 when President
Richard Nixon rescinded the policy, deregulating the metal, and
once again permitting ownership by U. S. citizens. During the
roughly forty years since its deregulation, the price of gold
reacted to various market forces, often unpredictable. By 1980
its price exceeded $600 per ounce; by 1990 it could be purchased
for $375; ten year later, in 2000, it dropped to $275; by 2005
it recovered to $450; in 2010—a scant five years later—it hit
$1,250; at this writing, April 29, 2011, it boasts a value of
$1,565.70, with daily increases of $25 not uncommon. For
whatever reason, gold appears to be going straight up.
Enough of history—on to the future! Does anyone predict this
continued phenomenal rise in the price of gold? One
knowledgeable person certainly does. Frank Holmes, CEO at U.S.
Global Investors, envisions gold rising to $2,000 per ounce. He
argues that virtually all commodities except gold have gone
through their “inflation-adjusted 1980 price levels,” which
translates to a value in excess of $2,000, and that “the
long-term trend will be strongly upward.”
Looking well beyond the $2,000 per ounce value, we find another
enthusiast, Lindsey Williams, a pastor who claims inside
disclosures from the elite inform him of commodity trends. He
predicts gold at $3,000 per ounce before the end of 2012.
Although this inside information may be questioned, Rev.
Williams’ accurate prior forecasts on the price of crude oil
speak well for him.
A
concurring prediction of gold at $3,000 comes from David
Rosenburg, a former chief North American economist at Merrill
Lynch, and now chief economist and market strategist at Guskin
Sheff & Associates, Inc., Toronto, Canada. As long ago as June
2010, with gold at $1250 per ounce, he reported on a
Bloomberg video interview that he considered a $3,000 value
to be “conservative.” No doubt his attitude would be even more
enthusiastic today.
This
article is now at the point where I must address its title:
Is Gold at $3,000 an Ounce Just a Matter of Time?
Simply reviewing history and presenting the opinions of select
investment experts won’t suffice. I will now offer my
prediction and explain my reasons. However, to begin with, I
offer an apology of sorts. To suggest that something will
attain a particular price within “a matter of time” is unfairly
vague. Given enough time, almost anything can come to pass.
One of my obscure readings revealed that in 6th Century England,
a workman was prohibited by law from earning more than 100
milrays per day, a milray being one-hundredth of a penny. To
suggest then that in “just a matter of time” a workman might
earn ten dollars a day (100,000 milrays) would prove to be
correct . . . but meaningless. Thus, it’s possible that gold
will sell at $500,000 per ounce “in a matter of time,” but that
may be forty generations hence. For this reason I’ll revise my
title to read: Is Gold at $3,000 an Ounce on the Near
Horizon? Now this is a question I can get my teeth into.
I
believe there to be three principal factors which will determine
gold prices over the foreseeable future, and for our purposes I
consider foreseeable as extending only through this
decade. What may happen in the years beyond 2020 becomes
increasingly less related to anything we can anticipate or
control. These three factors are (1) inflation in the economy
(2) governmental intervention (3) intrinsic use of gold. Let’s
look at each of these.
(1)
Inflation in the Economy. A conventional belief exists, perhaps
accurately, that rapid inflation in an economy will cause gold
prices to rise. In characterizing inflation, we’ll accept the
definition of The American Heritage Dictionary of the English
Language, Fourth Edition, 2000, which states:
A
persistent increase in the level of consumer prices or a
persistent decline in the purchasing power of money, caused by
an increase in available currency and credit beyond the
proportion of available goods and services.
If we
look no further than the uncontrolled spending and increasing
national debt which our nation’s leaders promote, we cannot help
but conclude that a high rate of inflation will follow. If our
presumption is correct that this will spur a rise in gold
prices, then chalk up one vote in that direction.
(2)
Governmental Intervention. Whether or not uncontrolled
inflation will result from our nation’s spending policies, there
can be no doubt that our economy is nowhere near recovered from
the miseries of these past four years. My belief is that it is
a depression, not a recession, from which we must emerge, and
with high unemployment continuing as a major drag on the
economy, our citizens’ suffering will continue. Regardless of
your political experience or economic expertise, there is really
no way you can predict what action a government may take as an
economy continues to unravel. As our elected public officials
generally specialize in getting elected to public office, rather
than in effectively resolving problems after being elected, we
may only guess as to what precious metals regulations they may
enact. I’m afraid this second factor cannot guide us in
predicting the direction that gold prices will take.
(3)
Intrinsic Use of Gold. We are now at what I believe to be the
crux in determining future gold prices. Central to my reasoning
is a fundamental reality: Except for its use in ornamentation,
the metal possesses no commercially viable application. It can
be admiringly gazed at, sensually fondled, and tastelessly
drooled upon, but that is where its use ends. Simply stated,
the value of gold is what a buyer can be induced to pay for it.
By contrast, as an investor I became the unwitting owner of a
house in an adjacent county that experienced a drop in value.
Though I’m not pleased with my acquisition, particularly with
valuable cash tied up in it, it’s currently rented to an affable
tenant and generating what amounts to a rather dismal 3% annual
return. I contend that the value of any investment relates to
the income flow it produces. But an investor in gold who
likewise sees its value plummet can resort to no such
money-generating application while waiting to see if the market
corrects itself. It is this lack of income generation that does
not portend well for gold. Cast one ballot in the downward
direction.
I’ll
now summarize my expectations as to where I see gold heading
over the next eight to ten years. Fundamental to my prognosis
is the recognition that the current rapid escalation in price
per ounce is contrary to its historical trend. I acknowledge,
of course, that vast fortunes may be made through involvement in
precious metals, and at times it can seem almost magical.
However, when it comes to our personal investment program, we
must put fantasy aside. The gold frenzy is quite recent; it’s
my experience that what rises rapidly normally declines in the
same way.
I’ll
now insert another factor into the mix. In my opinion, the
escalation in gold prices over the past several years can be
attributed to a combination of two realities: First, that most
investors have been deprived of any viable investments. Money
market funds and CDs pay next to nothing; bonds appear hazardous
if interest rates rise as many predict; real estate is in the
dumps with no sign of recovery; and dividend yields are at an
historic low. So, with no truly enticing investments to attract
the public, gold can be offered as an acceptable alternative.
The
second half of the reality is evident to anyone paying
attention. For the past few years precious metals, and
particularly gold, continue to be touted from every conceivable
forum. Talk show hosts pitch it; television ads praise it;
financial advisors of every stripe are hired to recommend it;
full-hour informercials extol it. You cannot spend fifteen
minutes in any media environment without being told that gold is
the investment of the century and that its value will rise
forever. As expected, there are legions of poor innocents who,
burned by securities or real estate, are eager to travel the
one sure road to everlasting wealth. Thus gold is effectively
peddled, and as long as the sales continue, its price will
rise. At some point this market will return to earth.
I’ll
conclude with a final thought. Whether or not gold makes it to
$3,000 per ounce is not nearly as meaningful as the question: Is
gold a wise investment? My response must be in the negative.
Despite recommendations to the contrary, there is no sound
justification for investment in precious metals, whether as the
base metal, the specie, or stock in related companies. The
markets for gold, silver, and the like long ago entered the
pseudo-religious realm, with adherents extolling their virtues,
much as with Scientology or transcendental meditation. These
markets are, by their nature, subject to manipulation, so that
performance cannot rationally be predicted.